Vilnius  ·  Tallinn Working language: English  ·  First reply in minutes, price within one business day
Intellectual property · Technology · Digital assets — Lithuania & Estonia

Interim relief in brand disputes: costs drivers

Interim relief lets a brand owner stop an infringing act before a full case is decided. In trade mark and design disputes it is used against copying, parallel imports and lookalike packaging. The request is fast by design, but its cost depends on how many registers are involved, how strong the evidence is, and whether the other side resists.

What changes once a request is filed

Filing an interim relief request starts a short, tightly timed procedure. The other side is usually heard, unless surprise is essential to the outcome. From that point, both sides work under a compressed calendar: evidence has to be ready, not gathered on the way. A weak evidence file at filing rarely improves later — the court or office rules on what is in front of it that week.

There is a point of no return: once the request is submitted, withdrawing it without cost consequences becomes difficult. This is why preparation, not speed, is the real driver of cost.

Steps to prepare

  1. Collect proof of the registered right: certificate, renewal status, and any licence affecting standing.
  2. Document the infringing act — dated screenshots, product samples, invoices, or market surveillance reports.
  3. Establish urgency: show why waiting for a full trial would cause harm that cannot be undone later.
  4. Instruct counsel to draft the request and supporting statement, matched to the forum's procedural rules.
  5. Decide whether the other side will be heard before the decision, or after it, and prepare for either.
  6. Prepare a parallel track for enforcement — bailiff, marketplace notice, or customs authority, once the order exists.

Who decides and how long it takes

The forum depends on where the right is registered and where the infringement occurs. For an EU-wide trade mark, an EU trade mark court hears the request; for a national right, the competent national court does. Where goods cross a border, a customs authority can act on request, holding shipments while the underlying dispute is resolved.

Turnaround is usually days to a few weeks, not months — that speed is the point of interim relief. A hearing, if held, is short and focused on urgency and likelihood of success, not on the full merits of the case.

Cost drivers

Cost is not fixed to a stage; it moves with a handful of variables. The table below sets out what raises the effort involved, without attaching amounts.

DriverEffect on cost
Number of registers and jurisdictionsEach additional register or country adds a separate evidence pack and, often, separate counsel.
Strength of existing evidenceGaps mean urgent fact-finding under time pressure, which is more expensive than routine work.
Opposition from the other sideA contested hearing costs more than an uncontested order; expect written submissions and possibly oral argument.
Cross-border enforcementInvolving a customs authority or a bailiff adds a distinct workstream on top of the court request.
Translation and certification needsEvidence in another language adds certified translation and, sometimes, notarisation.
Ongoing infringement versus a single actA continuing infringement may require follow-up monitoring after the order is granted.

If the underlying dispute also involves patent claims rather than a registered mark, the evidence file looks different from the start. How claim construction patent documents to prepare runs in sets out what that file contains.

Common scenarios

What this page does not cover

This page does not set out how long a registered right lasts, what can be registered, or what a full trial on the merits costs. It also does not name specific statutory provisions — those vary by jurisdiction and forum, and the office or court handling the request will confirm the applicable procedural rules at filing.

Sources and limits

This overview reflects general procedural practice in interim relief before EU trade mark courts, national courts and customs authorities. Specific timing and formal requirements are set by each forum's own procedural rules and are confirmed case by case, not summarised here. Where the dispute concerns an asset rather than a registered mark, the starting analysis differs; Asset in Belgium in detail sets out that separate track.

Last checked: this page is reviewed periodically against current procedural practice; no statutory citation is given because this is a procedural, forum-facing overview rather than a legal reference.

How the file is built

A request for interim relief is built from three parts: proof of the right, proof of the infringing act, and proof of urgency. Each part is assembled separately and cross-checked before filing, because a court will not wait for a missing piece once the clock starts. Where enforcement crosses a border, a fourth part — an enforcement plan — is added once the order exists, not before.

Related reading

A related enforcement question, outside court proceedings, is what happens when infringing listings appear on a marketplace rather than in physical trade. How platform takedown procedure trade mark costs drivers runs sets out that separate, faster route.

FAQ

How long does interim relief in brand disputes take in practice?

Most requests are decided within days to a few weeks. Uncontested requests with strong evidence move fastest; contested ones with a hearing take longer.

Which documents are needed to start?

A certificate or extract proving the right, dated evidence of the infringing act, and a statement establishing urgency. Missing any one of these delays the request rather than the decision itself.

What happens if the other side does not respond?

An uncontested request is usually decided on the papers, without a hearing. The order still has to be served and enforced once granted; silence does not extend the deadline for that step.

Next step

If you are weighing whether to file, the first useful step is a short call, not a written report. We reply to a first message within minutes during business hours, and a fee proposal follows within one business day. If the file also touches design ownership — for example where an agency holds the underlying design files — When an agency keeps the design files and the sets out what to settle first.

Make an enquiry

Or email us directly: info@aurelislaw.com